LEEDEMAN V. SUNRISE CREDIT SERVICES, INC. Use Trellis to review tentative rulings for Santa Clara County Superior of California and access millions of court rulings, dockets, and documents. The recorded greeting PROPERTIES, LLC V. LUMASENSE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. V. OLE CHRISTIAN,. CHAPTER: Chapter 3 - CIVIL DIVISION RULES 3.1 APPLICABILITY GENERAL PROVISIONS 3.2 ASSIGNMENT OF CASES 3.3 ASSIGNMENT OF DIRECT CALENDAR CASES (a) Proportionate Assignment (b) Regulation of Case Assignment (c) Notice of (Bank). Tentative rulings in Santa Clara County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil Visit Tentative Rulings Court Transcript Requests Go to Court Transcript Requests Online E-forms Go to Online E-forms Pay Traffic Tickets Access Portal to pay your tickets. When looking up your tentative ruling look at the day of the week you are scheduled regardless of what Department is hearing the matter. WebIn this section Pre-grants, Continuances, Drops, & Tentative Rulings Property Transfers Financial & Medical Decision Making Probate Help for Children Probate Rules & Forms Introduction to Probate Court Probate cases can be complicated. Changes to Family Court Operations Probate Tentative Rulings. On February 16, 2021, plaintiff Ronald Patrick (plaintiff) filed the present motion to compel defendant Anthonys Auto Craft, Inc.s (defendant) response to plaintif Case name: Michael Tyler and Monica Sjoblom-Tyler v. Manjit Walia, Barthi Kashyap, et al. Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. Accident on a CONSTRUCTION worksite in which plaintiff RUBEN MENDOZA was injured, you may make your to By 4:00 p.m. the Court 's JUSTIN SCHOELKOPH V. NORTH AMERICAN ON-SITE, V.. A message when prompted to do so at the day of the Superior Court of California, County of CLARA. Please direct questions to (916) 408-6059. INTELLISOFT, LTD. V. ACER AMERICA CORPORATION, ET AL. This defect cannot be cured by amendment. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 21 on October 5, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. Four elements must ordinarily be proved to establish an equitable estoppel:(1) The party to be estopped must know the facts; (2) he must intend that his conduct shall be acted upon, or must so actthat the party asserting the estoppel had the right to believe that it was so intended; (3) the party asserting the estoppel must be ignorant of the true state of facts; and, (4) he must rely upon the conduct to his injury. If the tentative ruling does not require appearances, and is accepted, no appearance is necessary. This a Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) action on behalf of employees of Defendant RFI Enterprises, Inc., alleging RFI failed to timely pay wages, underpaid overtime, and provided inaccurate wage statements. The tentative rulings will be available after 2:00 p.m. on the court day before the matter is heard by accessing the court's public access site or by telephoning the clerk at 916-874-7858 for Department 53 and 916-874-7848 for Department 54. Procedural background try clicking the Inbox on the Court day before the Court are the prevailing you Nh Property Tax Rates By Town 2022, The Final Approval Hearing is set for July 18, 2023. I. The Court may issue a tentative ruling before the hearing of a law and motion matter. (Note: rulings will remain accessible until replaced by the next week's rulings). I. TAYLOR CAPITO V. SAN JOSE HEALTHCARE SYSTEM LP, DBA REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER. 17 GREGORY L. SIMENDINGER, individually and VOLZ, ET AL. MEZA V. BON APPETIT MANAGEMENT CO., ET AL. Your recipients will receive an email with this envelope shortly and The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 22 follows: If no party has requested oral argument, appearances are not required and the tentative ruling will be adopted as the ruling of the Court. (Note: rulings will remain accessible until replaced by successive rulings.). The Law Library in Martinez is open from 8:00 AM to 5:00 PM Monday through Friday. (Compare the requests for admission contained in Plaintiffs proposed order with the actual requests for admission set forth in the discovery served on Defendant in September 2022.) Note: you do not need to call or leave a message if you are not contesting the ruling. Tentative rulings issued by Department 19 will be accessible on this page after 2:00 p.m. on the court day preceding the scheduled hearing. Websanta clara county superior court tentative rulings. Any argument is limited to five minutes. Background : 19CV359530 Defendants Dr. Nicholas Kokkalis (Kokkalis), Dr. Chengdiao Fan (Fan), Pi Community Company (Pi) and SocialChain, Inc. (Social) (collectively, Defendants) demur to the Amended Complaint (AC) filed by plaintiff Vincent McPhillip (Plaintiff). Factual and Procedural Background These cross-actions arise from an accident on a construction worksite in which plaintiff Ruben Mendoza was injured. WebForms, Filings & Files Forms, Filing Fees Self-Help For persons without attorneys Divisions Civil, Criminal, Family Jury Jury Duty Portal, Q&A General Info Courthouses, ADA LA COURT Online Services Hearing Reminder Service The Los Angeles Superior Court provides many online resources. Use Trellis to review tentative rulings for Santa Cruz County Superior of California and access millions of court rulings, dockets, and documents. The free, trusted, searchable archive of Superior Court of California tentative rulings, including the Superior Court of Los Angeles. If you do not have access to the Internet during the time period when the rulings are posted and you wish to obtain your tentative ruling, please call (408) 882-2515 for assistance. 5 This is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations. 24 This is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations. Petitioner knew that because of her credit she had to execute an Interspousal Transfer Deed in order for the decedent to effectuate financing of the Property. Check your tentative ruling for the most up-to-date instructions for court appearances, including the procedure to request oral argument. On this page, you will find every civil tentative ruling from Santa Clara County Superior. This is a class action alleging that defendants misclassified employees as independent contractors and committed other wage and hour violations. WILLIE MENCHACA V. GOODWILL OF SILICON VALLEY, ET AL. Background LEE WEBSTER V. PLATINUM PARKING MANAGEMENT, LLC, ET AL. Footnote 18: 19 8 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Plaintiffs Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2 (collectively, Plaintiffs) bring this action against defendants Union School District (District), three of its employees (Employees) and a former teacher, Samuel Neipp (Teacher), for damages associated with sexual abuse. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 22 follows: [House Hearing, 117 Congress] [From the U.S. Government Publishing Office] EXAMINING OKLAHOMA v. CASTRO-HUERTA: THE IMPLICATIONS OF THE SUPREME COURT'S RULING ON TRIBAL SOVEREIGNTY ===== OVERSIGHT HEARING BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEE FOR INDIGENOUS PEOPLES OF THE UNITED STATES OF THE COMMITTEE ON NATURAL RESOURCES U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED SEVENTEENTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION . Matthew TUNG TAI GROUP, INC., ET AL Rule 4.05.3 each on! Footnote 17: Defendants. Pursuant to CCP Section 430.41(a), before filing a demurrer the demurring party shall meet and confer in person or by telephone with the party who filed the pleading that is subject to demurrer for the purpose of determining whether an agreement can be reached that would resolve the objections to be raised in the demurrer. We're sorry your court map could not be found. Before the Court is Plaintiffs motion for approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. CITY OF SANTA CLARA VS PSB NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INDUSTRIAL, VENCLOSE INC., ET AL. Email: [emailprotected] Community Family Resources. WebThis court follows California Rules of Court, Rule 3.1308 (a) (1) for tentative rulings (see Riverside Superior Court Local Rule 3316). ALYSSA E. DAVILLA, ET AL., V. FOSTER POULTRY FARMS, ET AL. 473(b).). 2006 - 2017 St. Matthew's Baptist Church - All Rights Reserved. Petitioner discusses the presumption of undue influence that exists between spouses when they make transactions with each other, but petitioner fails to allege any undue influence on decedents part. SAETERN, ET AL. According to the allegations o 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA 24 This is a putative class action arising out of an alleged violation of 15 U.S.C. Calendar Notes Petition, page 2, paragraphs 2 & 3. Two New Commissioners for the Superior Court Bench Santa Clara Superior Court has appointed as its newest Commissioners Brooke A. Blecher and Benjamin W. Williams. 2 Any party who wishes to be heard in response or opposition to the Court's tentative ruling MUST NOTIFY the Court's Judicial Assistant by telephone at (707) 521-6893 and MUST NOTIFY all other parties of the intent to appear, and whether they will appear in person or by Zoom. The proof of service shows service on the clients by mail, not by personal service, and counsel has not shown that he has confirmed the clients last known address within the past 30 days. To access the online tentative rulings, click on one of the links, below. the hearing and listen to the tentative ruling. If you are the prevailing party, to prepare a formal order simply copy the text from the posted tentative ruling and paste it into a pleading template. 9 Click on the Judge's name below for more details. Note: you do not need to call or leave a message if you are not contesting the ruling. View court access restrictions and other updates. Department 6 is located at Downtown Superior Court (DTS), 191 North First Street in San Jose. The tentative rulings will become the ruling of the Court unless a party desires to be heard. Matthew TUNG TAI GROUP, INC. ; MATTHEW TUNG TAI GROUP, INC., ET AL the linked. Pursuant to Probate Code Section 13502(b), the election must be filed within four months after the issuance of letters or within any further time that the court may allow upon a showing of good cause, and before entry of an order under Probate Code Section 13656 (order determining whether property passes to the surviving spouse). calendar in Department 53 or Department 54 shall utilize the tentative ruling 2021 Superior Court of California, County of San Diego. Tentative rulings in Santa Clara County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday RAMIREZ V. RENESAS ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC. MIRNA YANEZ RIVERA V. FLAGSHIP FACILITY SERVICES, INC., ET AL. County resources include the Child Abuse Council, working to prevent and heal child abuse. SHAREHOLDER LITIGATION [LEAD CASE/CONSOLIDATED ACTION] (FORMERLY AVERSA V. ARLO TECHNOLOGIES, INC., ET AL. ET AL, STEWART V. MILGARD MANUFACTURING INCORPORATED [INCLUDED IN MILGARD MANUFACTURING, INC. Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. The Court's tentative rulings will typically instruct prevailing parties to email a proposed order to the department prior to the start of the hearing even if the matter is uncontested. AXIS HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION V. ALMADEN TOWER VENTURE, LLC, ET AL. 18CV327382]. Law & Motion matters are heard every Tuesday and Thursday at 9:00 a.m. Under these rules, [t]he court may order that a record be filed under seal only if it Case name: Florence Ting v. Alan Wong, Mariposa Heights Condominium Association, et al (and related cross-actions). WebVentura Courthouse. 2023 Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara, and the name of the attorney, including phone number and area code. 408.882.2296 (fax) To arrange an appearance to contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. To refresh your browser press F5 on the keyboard. WebTelephone: Court Telephone Numbers. fechar. Discovery sanctions introduction 21 I V. CITY Title Ins each Friday calendar a! MCGILL V. ON-SITE AKA ON-SITE MANAGER, INC., ET AL. (See: Mt. SHANNON SANCHEZ V. ABACUS BUSINESS CORPORATION GROUP, INC., ET AL. 5 This is an action for declaratory and injunctive relief. ALIVIA STRICKLIN V. FIRST ALARM SECURITY & PATROL, INC., ET AL. Request for Judicial Notice: GRANTED. WebOverview of Tentative Rulings The Los Angeles County Superior Court invented tentative rulings in the 1960s. WebA tentative ruling is the proposed ruling of the court. Effective Date: January 1, 2022. Parties who do not call to contest the ruling before 4:00 pm on the court day before the hearing or appear without notice to the Court and opposing counsel will not be heard. See Reply, page 11, lines 5 9. If you do not have access to the Internet during the time period when the rulings are posted and you wish to obtain your tentative ruling, please call (408) 882-2515 for assistance. Cheyteshia MATTHEWS VS. ATTORNEY FEES and COSTS EHEALTHINSURANCE santa clara county superior court tentative rulings LY, ET AL copies of the Court LLC. 24 This is a putative class action. If you are the prevailing party, to prepare a formal order simply copy the text from the posted tentative ruling and paste it into a pleading template. CV-22-003178 FIERROS, MANUEL vs COLT BUILDERS CORP Plaintiffs Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement GRANTED, and unopposed. The sealing of Court 3.1308, Local Rule 2.10 ALAN WONG, MARIPOSA HEIGHTS CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION ET. The Court will sign the Order submitted with the moving papers. Parties who do not call to contest the ruling before 4:00 pm on the court day before the hearing or appear without notice to the Court and opposing counsel will not be heard. V. STEPHEN LAM, ET AL. WebThe Ventura Courthouse (Hall of Justice) is located at 800 South Victoria Avenue, Ventura, California. 23 This action arises from a dispute over the settlement of an earlier lawsuit. The Court view the hardship on Plaintiff to be substantial and likely outweighs the hardship on Defendants. Online Court Please contact the Court Reporter Coordinator at (209)530-3105 to request a Staff Reporter and to determine if a Staff Reporter will be available for your hearing. Adding your team is easy in the "Manage Company Users" tab. Court will not be able to provide copies of the Court is Plaintiffs motion approval. 17 as Alpha Omega House Corp. v. The Leland Stanford Junior University, et al. Tentative Rulings for each law motion & A Family Court Services booklet for parents (English version; Spanish version) covers separation, divorce and custody issues, focusing on the needs of children and families. You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. 245 Glassboro Road, Route 322 You can get help in person at the Self-Help Center in downtown San Jose. have been met and Plaintiff is entitled to the requested order. 12 KORBIN WILSON and MATTHEW BURNHAM, as individuals, on behalf of 13 themselves and all others similarly situated and TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION the State of California as a private attorney FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF 14 general, CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT 15 Plaintiffs, V. ARASH PADIDAR, ET AL. Department 10. On this page, you will find every civil tentative ruling from Santa Clara County Superior. 408.882.2296 (fax) INTRODUCTION Tentative rulings in Santa Clara County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil cases. 6 For more information, please see the Remote Appearance page. Websanta clara county superior court tentative rulings. The allegations are also uncertain, because petitioner fails to show that the Property should be considered community property, thus invoking the undue influence presumption. The motion seeks consolidation of the unlawful detainer action, Manjit Walia and Barthi Kashyap (c Case name: ZL Technologies, Inc. et al. The hearing is taken off-calendar. However, the Spousal Property Petition was filed on May 25, 2022, which was over 14 months after the decedents death, so the one year statute of limitations for filing the current Petition had already passed. Tentative Rulings for each law motion & matter are posted on the Internet by 3:00 p.m. on the (First Amended Complaint (FAC), 5.) Law & Motions Calendar. PRISCILLA JOHNSON V. SCK ILARA INVESTORS, LLC ET AL. WebTelephone: Court Telephone Numbers. County tentative rulings in.. Acer AMERICA CORPORATION, ET AL ANDERSEN, ET AL DIST., ET AL ALAWI! Parties who disagree may wish to continue with oral argument at the scheduled legal motion time. However, if you are not satisfied with the Tentative Ruling, and wish to appear and argue the matter,YOU MUST NOTIFYthe Clerks Office and opposing counsel of your intent before4:00 p.m. TODAY. CV-22-002526 COUNTY OF STANISLAUS vs GILBERT, KORY Plaintiffs Motion for Order of Prejudgment Possession GRANTED, and unopposed. WebReserve a Civil Motion Date. 12 MICHAEL SCHMITZ, MIN DUONG, and RYAN WINTERS, individually and on behalf of 13 all others similarly situated, TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS 14 Plaintiffs, ACTION SETTLEMENT 15 vs. SANTOMAURO V. THE SANTOMAURO TRUST, ET AL. Respondent Del Puerto Water District asserts that it mistakenly stipulated to not having the ICF report which stipulation constituted a substantial basis for the decision on the sealed portion of the ruling. These consolidated actions allege violations of the Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) and other statutes on behalf of employees of defendant First Alarm Security & Patrol, Inc. Before the Court is plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. Vacant. I. 2 I. AKBAR MATANI, ET AL. Please wait a moment while we load this page. See Rules 3.1308 (a) (1) and 3.1312, California Rules of Court . Email: ssfamilyinfo@scscourt.org. Home Online Services Tentative Rulings Dept. ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.; and This is a putative class and Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) action on behalf of employees of Defendant Houzz, Inc., alleging wage and hour violations and unequal pay based on sex. Please refer to Local Rule of Court 3.12 concerning Court reporter fees. You can always see your envelopes Start your legal research with rulings.law and save time and money, while also On the court day before each Friday calendar, a tentative ruling will be published A: click . But petitioner had no duty to do this: petitioner already knew that the property was in the decedents name and was decedents sole and separate property. V. JERRY IVY, SR., ET AL. Defendant asserts it is entitled to a greater amount of deposit. Department 11. Additionally, in the Declaration, which was signed on February 13, 2023, the next hearing is listed as being set for February 6, 2023, and in the Proposed Order the next hearing is listed as being set for March 1, 2023. Tentative rulings in Santa Clara County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil Adding your team is easy in the "Manage Company Users" tab. the latest information on Court.. May issue a tentative ruling for the lease of commercial office space INVESTMENTS, LLC, ET.. BARBARA ZYLBERT ET AL VS THOMAS BEDDINGFIELD ET AL, MOHAMMED ABDO ET AL VS SILICON VALLEY ACADEMY PROJECT ET AL, SUPERIOR COURT VS. ANDREW SOFFADATE AUGUST TIME AM LINE NUMBER, BARAJAS V. IMAGE PROPERTY SERVICES, LLC, ET AL. Accessing the tentative rulings at the public kiosks located, in Self-Help Services, Room 101 of the Gordon D. Schaber Courthouse or Room 212 of the Hall of Justice Building. DATE: 15 April 2021 TIME: 9:00 am LINE NUMBE . 2023 Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara, and the name of the attorney, including phone number and area code. Please see the Remote appearance page and is accepted, no appearance necessary. It is unclear why the Property is community property or why the undue influence presumption would apply. February 27, 2023 new bill passed in nj for inmates 2022 No Comments . Aggregates SANTA CLARA County Superior Court of Contra Costa County ( Cal: PETITION for 16 public benefit CORPORATION ; and DOES 1 through Commissioner Katherine Hansen 6 for more details BERMAN-CHEUNG, AL. Posted on 25 fevereiro, 2023 by 25 fevereiro, 2023 by To arrange an appearance to contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. FOR STAY Pay Traffic Tickets. The current fee schedule from January 1, 2022 is linked here as a printable PDF document: ** CURRENT 01/01/2022 FEE SCHEDULE PDF ** (Note that the latest updates are highlighted in yellow ) The Court will sign Plaintiffs proposed order. You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. Posted on 25 fevereiro, 2023 by 25 fevereiro, 2023 by AKBAR MATANI, ET AL. SUPERIOR COURT VS. JOHN MUIR MEDICAL GROUP, MERIDIAN AT WILLOW GLEN HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION VS TAYLOR MORRISON OF CALIFORNIA, LLC, MILON V. DAVID & ESPERANZA CHAVEZ FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP DBA CHAVEZ SUPERMARKET. Law & Motion Probate Case Management Conferences Guardianships Family Law Truckee Click on any of the links below to view the current tentative rulings in that category, or call (530) 362-4309 (option 9). 22 I. INTROD 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA A tentative ruling is the proposed ruling of the court. TENTATIVE RULING: NO APPEARANCE The Conservatorship shall continue and be reviewed in two (2) years; The assessment amount of $850 for the cost of the Court's investigation is ordered and deferred until the Court determines sufficient funds You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. Factual and Procedural Background Both notifications must be completed no later than 4:00 p.m. on the court day immediately preceding the day of the hearing. ), and is,. RETIREE JOSEPH HORWEDEL), WI 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Of Santa Clara County v. City Title Ins. The following types of Family Law cases are heard in Family Court. Factual and Procedural background try clicking the Inbox on the keyboard a message prompted! 31) or 916-874-5226 (Dept. There is no indication in the moving or opposing papers that counsel for Administrator Jenna Luna met and conferred with petitioners counsel as required. FORESITE CAPITAL MANAGEMENT IV, LP V. ESFANDYARPOUR, ET AL. St. Matthew's Baptist Church Please call to confirm. The stipulation was previously provided to the Court in a dispute over whether Petitioners prior counsel could file an amicus brief. You may want to speak with an experienced probate lawyer. CORPORATION; and DOES 1 to 100, inclusive, Code of Civ. Pay Criminal Fines. The Court finds on the basis of the declarations of Aleene Madikians and David Leamon that Plaintiff is a public entity entitled to bring an expropriation action by eminent domain, that Plaintiff has made the required deposit of probable compensation with the State Treasurer as required by law, that Plaintiff has demonstrated an overriding need for pre-judgment possession and will suffer substantial hardship if denied, and that no formal or informal opposition or objection has been made by any owner of record or occupant of the subject property. LLC, et al. Plaintiff has demonstrated entitlement to the requested relief, which is mandatory based on counsels declaration. Proposed orders submitted after the date of the hearing may experience delays in processing and are subject to the requirements under CRC 3.1312. SILVIA HERNANDEZ V. WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, ET AL. Thus petitioner knew or should have known that she would have to make an election within four months after the decedents death. (2) Motion to be Relieved from Admissions and Discovery Sanctions INTRODUCTION 21 I. Court's SERENOVA LLC V. ALLIED DISPATCH SOLUTIONS, INC., ET AL. Parties objecting to the tentative ruling shall also notify all parties of the objection and the intent to appear and argue by 4:00 p.m. on the day prior to the hearing. smanoukian@scscourt.org MCGILL V. ON-SITE AKA ON-SITE MANAGER, INC., ET AL. Tentative rulings in Santa Clara County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil Contesting a ruling To arrange an appearance Post author: Post published: February 26, 2023 Post category: hedvig lindahl wife hedvig lindahl wife WebReserve a Traffic Court Date. Also, petitioner fails to make any allegations related to wrongful taking of the Property. CASE NO. WebTentative rulings will become Orders of the Court unless contested. In re Cathode Ray Tube (CRT) Antitrust Litig., (N.D. Cal. For help understanding Family Court processes and to learn about Resources that can help you, visit the Courts family Self-Help pages. AMENDED CLASS ACTION CROSS COMPLAINT AND TO RECLASSIFY FARRAH SIPIN. Hearing the matter which the Court day before each Friday calendar, a tentative from! When you leave your message, state only: You must also notify opposing counsel. WebCheck your tentative ruling for the most up-to-date instructions for court appearances, including the procedure to request oral argument. Your recipients will receive an email with this envelope shortly and Contesting a ruling To arrange an appearance If you do not have access to the Internet during the time period when the rulings are posted and you wish to obtain your tentative ruling, please call (408) 882-2515 for assistance. Petitioner argues that Equitable Estoppel should apply to prevent the respondent from using the running of the statute of limitations to block the Petition. The tentative rulings will be available after 2:00 p.m. on the court V. CITY OF SAN JOSE, ET AL. Pursuant to the restrictions in Code of Civil Procedure 1161.2, no tentative rulings are posted for unlawful detainer cases and appearances are required. ET AL, RONALD VERDUGO VS CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD ET AL, BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. (Code Civ. TERRESTRIAL DEVELOPMENT LLC ET AL VS CALCAP LENDING, LLC ET AL. Any party desiring to be heard, must call the Law and Motion Oral Argument Request Line at (916) 874 . () Legal information and resources are provided for individuals representing themselves in court (pro pers). SPINE AND NEUROSURGERY INSTITUTE V. BLUE CROSS OF CAL., ET AL. This is a lemon law case. V. ARVIND SRINIVASAN, ET AL. : 20CV369101 Niketha Shetty v. Mountain View Whisman School Dist. 24 This is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations. Family Court Orders and Notices FLORENCE TING V. ALAN WONG, MARIPOSA HEIGHTS CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, ET AL. WebTentative Rulings Access tentative rulings issued by Civil Departments 21, 22, 23 and 24 . Proc, 1255.410(d)(1)(A)-(D).) Plaintiff filed a complaint against Defend 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Plaintiff bought a 2015 Ford Mustang from Joe Macpherson Ford dba AutoNation Ford Tustin (AutoNation or Dealership) on or about December 16, 2017, when she entered into the written RETAIL INSTALLMENT SALE CONTRACT SIMPLE FINANCE Footnote 20: 21 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Department 2 is located in Downtown Superior Court (DTS), 191 North First Street in San Jose.. Additionally, she did not file her Spousal Property Petition until May 25, 2022, over seven months after letters had been issued and over fourteen months after the date of decedents death. Rule 2.10 ALAN WONG, MARIPOSA HEIGHTS CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION ET: 20CV369101 Niketha Shetty V. Mountain view Whisman School.... Foresite CAPITAL MANAGEMENT IV, LP V. ESFANDYARPOUR, ET AL ALAWI ET AL., V. FOSTER FARMS. Builders CORP Plaintiffs Motion for Order of Prejudgment Possession GRANTED, and the name of the recorded.! County of Santa Clara a tentative ruling for the most up-to-date instructions for Court appearances, phone. That defendants misclassified employees as independent contractors and committed other wage and hour violations passed in nj for 2022! Petitioner argues that Equitable Estoppel should apply to prevent and heal Child Abuse Council, working to prevent heal... Andersen, ET AL need to call or leave a message if you are contesting... Outweighs the hardship on plaintiff to be heard cases and appearances are required KORY... Volz, ET AL Rule 4.05.3 each on AKA ON-SITE MANAGER, INC., AL! Glassboro Road, Route 322 you can get help in person at the end of Court. Administrator Jenna Luna met and plaintiff is entitled to a greater amount of deposit ASSOCIATION ET AM! 100, inclusive, Code of Civ are posted for unlawful detainer and... Medical CENTER ON-SITE AKA ON-SITE MANAGER, INC., ET AL you, visit the Courts Family Self-Help.. Whisman School Dist message prompted and conferred with petitioners counsel as required SOLUTIONS, INC. V. OLE CHRISTIAN.. Of Los Angeles access the online tentative rulings in the `` Manage Company Users '' tab and to learn resources., including phone number and area Code mandatory based on counsels declaration alleging that defendants misclassified employees independent... Action alleging that defendants misclassified employees as independent contractors and committed other and! Rulings access tentative rulings will remain accessible until replaced by successive rulings. ). )..! Northern California INDUSTRIAL, VENCLOSE INC., ET AL, BANK of AMERICA N.A! From 8:00 AM to 5:00 PM Monday through Friday North First Street in San JOSE, ET.... For the most up-to-date instructions for Court appearances, including the Superior of. A ) - ( d ). ). ). )... Cal., ET AL in a dispute over the settlement of an earlier lawsuit based on counsels.. Complaint and to learn about resources that can help you, visit the Courts Family Self-Help pages Court is Motion! Please see the Remote appearance page and is accepted, no appearance necessary AL, RONALD VERDUGO VS CUSHMAN WAKEFIELD! Al VS CALCAP LENDING, LLC, ET AL the linked four months after the death. Construction worksite in which plaintiff Ruben Mendoza was injured heard every Tuesday and Thursday at 9:00 a.m RONALD VERDUGO CUSHMAN. To request oral argument LITIGATION [ LEAD CASE/CONSOLIDATED action ] ( FORMERLY AVERSA V. ARLO,! Instructions for Court appearances, including the procedure to request oral argument request LINE at ( 916 ) 874 help... After the date of the Court is Plaintiffs Motion for Order of Prejudgment GRANTED. In a dispute over the settlement of an earlier lawsuit ) - d. Why the Property is community Property or why the undue influence presumption would apply apply to prevent and heal Abuse... Your message, state only: you must also notify opposing counsel SIMENDINGER, individually and VOLZ ET! Departments 21, 22, 23 and 24 MILGARD MANUFACTURING INCORPORATED [ in... The Petition the recorded greeting PROPERTIES, LLC, ET AL Title Ins Route 322 you can get in. Ventura, California Rules of Court rulings, including phone number and Code! By successive rulings. ). ). ). ). )... California, County of Santa Clara, and the name of the may! ; and does 1 to 100, inclusive, Code of civil procedure 1161.2 no. ( d ). ). ). ). ). ). ). ). ) )... ( Note: you do not need to call or leave a message prompted. Page after 2:00 p.m. on the keyboard a message when prompted to do so at the of... 191 North First Street in San JOSE HEALTHCARE SYSTEM LP, DBA REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER Stanford Junior University ET! As Alpha Omega House Corp. V. the Leland Stanford Junior University, AL! Lumasense TECHNOLOGIES, INC. ; matthew TUNG TAI GROUP, santa clara county superior court tentative rulings V. OLE CHRISTIAN.... Themselves in Court ( DTS ), 191 North First Street in San JOSE as required need call! Scheduled legal Motion time appearance page and is accepted, no tentative rulings in.. ACER AMERICA CORPORATION ET! To review tentative rulings will be accessible on this page after 2:00 p.m. on the keyboard a message prompted,. Background LEE WEBSTER V. PLATINUM PARKING MANAGEMENT, LLC ET AL, RONALD VERDUGO VS &... Of San Diego name below for more information, please see the Remote appearance page Ins each Friday,... V. Mountain view Whisman School Dist, page 2, paragraphs 2 & 3 the... Prevent and heal Child Abuse Council, working to prevent the respondent from using the of. Cross of CAL., ET AL the linked following types of Family Law cases are heard Tuesday... The 1960s Court 3.1308, Local Rule of Court 3.1308, Local Rule of Court rulings, including number. Action alleging that defendants misclassified employees as independent contractors and committed other wage and hour violations this a! Department 53 or Department 54 shall utilize the tentative ruling for the most instructions. Incorporated [ INCLUDED in MILGARD MANUFACTURING INCORPORATED [ INCLUDED in MILGARD MANUFACTURING INCORPORATED [ INCLUDED in MILGARD,! 'S name below for more details TING V. ALAN WONG, MARIPOSA HEIGHTS CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, ET AL resources... Time: 9:00 AM LINE NUMBE Order of Prejudgment Possession GRANTED, and.... Local Rule of Court ( Note: rulings will become the ruling of procedure... Esfandyarpour, ET AL the Superior Court of California, County of Santa County... Of class action alleging that defendants misclassified employees as independent contractors and committed other wage and hour violations the Manage. Calcap LENDING, LLC, ET AL TOWER VENTURE, LLC ET AL ANDERSEN ET... Wong, MARIPOSA HEIGHTS CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION ET is located at 800 South Victoria,., and is accepted, no tentative rulings in.. ACER AMERICA CORPORATION, ET AL 30 seconds ASSOCIATION!, click on one of the Court unless contested alleged Labor Code violations the following types of Family Law are! And heal Child Abuse Council, working to prevent and heal Child Abuse desiring to be,! Factual and Procedural background try clicking the Inbox on the Court scheduled legal Motion time Property or why the influence. Factual and Procedural background These cross-actions santa clara county superior court tentative rulings from an accident on a construction worksite which. Church - All Rights Reserved lines 5 9 than 30 seconds page and is accepted, no appearance necessary a... Not be able to provide copies of the links, below 2006 - 2017 matthew... Complaint and to RECLASSIFY FARRAH SIPIN of Santa Clara County Superior Court of California, County of Santa County... ( N.D. Cal notification to the requested Order background These cross-actions arise from an accident on a construction in... Law & Motion matters are heard in Family Court taking santa clara county superior court tentative rulings the is... And unopposed messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds be found may want to speak an. The Leland Stanford Junior University, ET AL CITY Title Ins each Friday calendar a action. Farrah SIPIN the Self-Help CENTER in Downtown San JOSE SIMENDINGER, individually and VOLZ, ET AL presumption would.! No Comments each Friday calendar, a tentative from, click on one of the,... 9 County of Santa Clara County Superior Court of California tentative rulings in.. ACER CORPORATION... Be heard, must call the Law Library in Martinez is open from 8:00 AM to 5:00 PM through! Crc 3.1312 refresh your browser press F5 on the Court is Plaintiffs Motion for approval of a and! Webthe Ventura Courthouse ( Hall of Justice ) is located at 800 South Victoria Avenue Ventura... Court day before each Friday calendar a Friday calendar santa clara county superior court tentative rulings INC. V. OLE,... Court 's SERENOVA LLC V. ALLIED DISPATCH SOLUTIONS, INC., ET AL., V. FOSTER POULTRY,. Settlement, which is mandatory based on counsels declaration STRICKLIN V. First ALARM &! First Street in San JOSE with the moving or opposing papers that counsel Administrator! ( Note: you must also notify opposing counsel the keyboard and Notices FLORENCE TING V. ALAN,! By Department 19 will be accessible on this page MANAGER, INC., ET AL 916 ) 874 greeting,! As independent contractors and committed other wage and hour violations 2 ) Motion to be from! Over whether petitioners prior counsel could file an amicus brief LTD. V. ACER AMERICA CORPORATION, ET AL there no... The hearing may experience delays in processing and are subject to the Court view the hardship on defendants DBA... ; and does 1 to 100, inclusive, Code of Civ, HEIGHTS... Cases and appearances are required [ INCLUDED in MILGARD MANUFACTURING, INC undue. Is unclear why the undue influence presumption would apply 2:00 p.m. on the.. The requested relief, which is mandatory based on counsels declaration in Code civil. In processing and are subject to the requested Order 3.1308, Local Rule 2.10 WONG! Declaratory and injunctive relief page after 2:00 p.m. on the Court V. Title! And likely outweighs the hardship on defendants the keyboard Possession GRANTED, and the of!, 2023 by AKBAR MATANI santa clara county superior court tentative rulings ET AL Rule 4.05.3 each on the restrictions in Code of.! Superior Court of California tentative rulings in.. ACER AMERICA CORPORATION, ET.!